Friday, April 29, 2005

a life

did i mention i have a life?

i have a life. :)


too much of a life, i suppose. wine-downs, partays, games - dammit so many things, so little time! wish i had someone special to share these with, i'm sure i can show the person people and things. you know, SHARE it with him.

but guess what, i'm just too tired to get another one.


i'd be content, i suppose, to just sit and watch rented dvds with him when i finally do get someone.

you know, be the supporting role. a halcyon of sorts within a person, like everything'd be alright because that person'd make everything alright. not because he/she really is making everything alright but that person gives you the strength to go on, face another day, because he/she is right there with you. i strive to be that. :) a 'friend'.

some ladies mind being in the supporting role, some don't. i happen to be one who doesn't, for we're supposed to be supporting roles to each other. no one can be at the front line all the time; you can't.

because it's not always the case that the issue lies within the area of your expertise. and feminists, if you're reading this: DIE.


damn morons. 'support' doesn't mean you're being stapled to the 'traditional' backwatered idea of 'you woman, you in kitchen'. if you were anything like the real woman, you'd understand that already.

did i say moron?



moron.
Posted by at

3 comments:

jenn said...

well you're assuming that all feminists have that idea though, think perhaps only the more extreme? and they seem to be a hard specie to find of late.. hmmmm

6:11 PM
loren said...

hum. they're hiding, but i know they're there...!

-grin-

but seriously, isn't what feminists think, primarily? that they're 'as good as if not better than' men. that or they dislike being hemmed into the 'traditional' roles or stereotype. granted, some are over-sensitive and that's the one that i'm targeting. hahaha then they complain about not being treated like a lady.

i don't like being sexist-ed myself but that doesn't mean i'm a feminist. feminists are those who pounce on the chance to defend their positions as equals when there is the slightest of indication that their positions as women are 'compromised'.

and yes, they're hard to find these troubled divorcing times - or are they?

not to say that long-suffering wives and bastards of men (or the other way around) are er.. not reasonable to base a divorce on but on the possible idea that these seeming victims are standing up for themselves.

..maybe (MAYBE ah, MAYBE only) these women once hurt that badly become over-sensitive and jump to defend whatever position they're in against them men? some take it to the extreme, some don't. those who do, well, 'feminists'.

if you don't like men standing up when you're leaving or returning to the table and say so, fine: you're independent. feminists are those who tell you right off that... whatever reason they can come up with because the gentleman's being courteous is irritating to them....

mm. doesn't make sense to my non-feminist ears leh.

but damn that's too long to post as a 'comment'. i should stop. heh.

4:02 AM
loren said...

pardon, when i said 'independent' about a lady's speaking up i meant 'practical'.

the next sentence to be added after that is 'if a lady prefers to carry her own luggage and thus turn down the offer to help with the load from a man, that's independent.'

(aiyah wanted to make use of the word 'independent' lah..)

4:07 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)